Offshore · KVM VPS

Offshore virtual servers with grown-up operator policy.

KVM-virtualised VPS in the Netherlands, Bulgaria and Moldova. NVMe storage, DDoS-protected by default, crypto payments, privacy-respecting operator. Everything a generalist offshore provider should be — run by people who know what operators actually need.

NL, BG, MD
KVM + NVMe
DDoS protection included
Crypto accepted
From € 19/mo

See plans Talk to us Chat on WhatsApp

Why offshore matters

Jurisdiction is infrastructure. Choose it on purpose.

Most operators think of hosting as a commodity decision: compare CPUs and gigabytes, pick the cheapest. But for meaningful workloads — content that attracts takedown requests, email infrastructure that attracts suspensions, privacy tools that attract government attention — the jurisdiction where your server lives is one of the most consequential technical decisions you make.

Our offshore VPS live in three jurisdictions chosen for their specific characteristics. The Netherlands combines top-tier connectivity with strong EU data protections and a court system that takes merits seriously. Bulgaria offers similar legal quality at lower cost, with excellent onshore datacenters. Moldova sits outside the EU entirely while remaining easy to reach commercially, and has a lighter-touch regulatory regime.

KVM with real kernel control

True hardware virtualisation. You can load your own kernel modules, run nested virtualisation, and install any Linux/BSD distribution. Not container theatre.

NVMe across the board

NVMe primary storage on every plan, not just on the premium tier. Typical IOPS above 50k on read and 30k on write for your workload.

DDoS protection included

Volumetric DDoS mitigation on by default up to ~10 Gbps of scrubbed traffic. Heavier protection available through partner networks.

Full privacy on payment

Bitcoin, Monero, Ethereum, Litecoin, USDT, USDC, PayPal and credit card. Minimum data collection — only what the account needs to operate.

Global backbone

Tier-1 transit from HE, Cogent, Telia, NTT. Low-latency routes to Europe, North America, Asia and Latin America.

You operate, we support

Root access on day one. Support answers infrastructure questions 24/7; we will not install your Wordpress for you, but we will help you debug why the kernel is panicking.

2026 reality

Three forces reshaped offshore VPS economics between 2023 and 2026.

If your last offshore VPS benchmark was 2022, three concrete shifts changed the operational and economic landscape in ways that materially affect provider selection. The pressures pushing legitimate operators offshore tightened, and the supply-side economics of clean offshore infrastructure improved.

First, commodity offshore VPS providers consolidated their margins down while specialist providers held steady on operational quality. The 2022-2024 entry of low-cost offshore providers (Contabo offshore expansion, Hetzner Falkenstein, multiple Eastern European newcomers) compressed commodity VPS pricing to €5-15/mo for entry-level KVM. This is genuinely good for clients with simple workloads. The trade-off is that operational expertise — abuse handling, due-process complaints, network engineering for sensitive workloads — became visibly stratified between commodity providers (race-to-bottom on price, automated suspensions on first complaint) and specialist providers (premium pricing reflecting the human review and policy expertise). Operators choosing offshore VPS in 2026 face a clearer choice: cheap-and-automated vs measured-and-deliberate. Both have legitimate niches.

Second, raw IPv4 hosting allocation became a separate product line from email IPs in 2024-2026. The dedicated IPv4 wholesale market matured to the point where allocating raw IPv4 for non-email workloads (web servers, application backends, API endpoints, CDN edge nodes, SSL/TLS certificate isolation) is a distinct product from email-sending IPs. Email IPs require warm-up infrastructure, blacklist screening, rDNS-for-sending, AI Assistant diagnostics, real-time Spamhaus protection — operational stack that justifies $22.95/IP/month pricing. Hosting IPs strip all of that operational stack because the workload is not email outbound; pricing drops to $7.95/IP/month for raw IPv4 allocation with generic rDNS, basic IP routing, and no deliverability infrastructure. The two products serve genuinely different needs and the pricing gap reflects real cost-to-operate differences.

Third, crypto payment infrastructure for VPS hosting matured significantly. In 2022, crypto-paid VPS hosting often meant manual invoice generation and delayed provisioning — a meaningful operational friction. By 2026, providers including Blue Spirit moved to fully automated crypto payment rails (BTC Lightning Network for sub-€100 transactions, on-chain XMR with stealth-address auto-confirm, USDT/USDC settlement integration with provisioning hooks). The practical effect: paying €19/mo VPS in Monero now provisions in 5-15 minutes instead of hours, with zero financial identity trail crossing the provider's books. This made privacy-respecting VPS operationally indistinguishable from card-paid VPS for most use cases — the friction tax disappeared.

The takeaway: in 2026 the offshore VPS decision optimizes for matching workload to provider tier (commodity for simple workloads, specialist for sensitive workloads), product-fit on IPv4 allocation (email IPs vs hosting IPs are different products with different pricing), and crypto-pay flexibility (now operationally seamless rather than friction-laden). Operators still treating "offshore VPS" as monolithic miss the optimization opportunities the 2024-2026 maturation created.

Decision framework

Netherlands, Bulgaria, or Moldova — which jurisdiction fits your workload?

Below is the same decision tree we walk on the discovery call. The branch labeled "commodity provider" is real — sometimes Contabo or Hetzner is the right answer to your specific workload, and we tell you that on the call rather than upselling unnecessary specialist hosting.

Two sub-points the diagram does not capture. First: multi-jurisdiction architectures are increasingly common for high-exposure operators. Sophisticated operators with serious threat profiles run primary VPS in Netherlands or Bulgaria with warm secondary in Moldova — the architecture means a successful action against one jurisdiction does not affect operations in others. Second: the right answer often combines multiple jurisdictions for different roles. Application VPS in Netherlands for low-latency user delivery, secondary database VPS in Bulgaria for cost-efficient backup, archival VPS in Moldova for non-EU compliance hedge. We architect this multi-tier setup during onboarding for clients with serious operational requirements.

No-KYC architecture — what makes anonymous signup actually anonymous.

"No-KYC" hosting is a marketing claim that most providers fail to deliver because their payment processor architecture creates an identity trail before the VPS provisions. The diagram below shows the architectural choices that make Blue Spirit's anonymous signup operationally honest rather than marketing-honest.

Three architectural choices in this stack worth highlighting. First: payment routing diversity is the actual differentiator — providers who offer "crypto payment" via a single processor that tags every transaction with Chainalysis metadata are not delivering meaningful payment anonymity. Our Monero settlement is direct on-chain with stealth addresses; BTC settles via our own Lightning node; USDT/USDC via custodian with operational separation. Second: log retention is policy-bound and architecturally enforced — 7-day operational logs auto-purge regardless of any specific request, which removes our ability to selectively preserve. Third: data disclosure is jurisdiction-locked — a Dutch court order can compel disclosure of Netherlands-hosted data; a US subpoena cannot. The architecture makes this enforceable rather than just policy-asserted.

IPv4 product separation

Hosting IPs at $7.95/IP/month — for non-email infrastructure workloads.

Many offshore VPS clients need additional IPv4 addresses for hosting workloads beyond what their VPS plan includes — additional sites with SSL/TLS certificate isolation, application backends with consistent egress IPs, API endpoints with stable client identity, CDN edge nodes. Our hosting IP product addresses this at $7.95/IP/month, separate from our email IP product at $22.95/IP/month.

Hosting IP — $7.95/IP/mo

For non-email infrastructure

Raw IPv4 allocation for web servers, application backends, API endpoints, CDN edge nodes, SSL/TLS certificate isolation per domain. Generic rDNS pointing to our infrastructure. Basic IP routing. No deliverability stack because the workload is not email outbound.

✓ Raw IPv4 allocation, generic rDNS
✓ BGP-routable, datacenter-direct
✓ Standard DDoS protection included
✓ Pool of 5 IPs: $39.75/mo · /29 (6 usable): $47.70/mo

⚠ NOT for email outbound — burns within hours of first send

Email IP — $22.95/IP/mo

For email outbound

Dedicated IPv4 for marketing, transactional, or cold email outbound with full deliverability operational stack: 30-day managed warm-up, 60+ blacklist screening, AI Assistant diagnostics, real-time Spamhaus protection, rDNS-for-sending, SPF/DKIM/DMARC alignment, Postmaster Tools registration.

✓ Full deliverability operational stack
✓ 50,000+ inbox engagement network warm-up
✓ Real-human reputation review weekly
✓ See dedicated email IPs for full details

✓ Right product for email senders

The price difference ($7.95 vs $22.95) reflects real cost-to-operate differences, not arbitrary tier segmentation. Hosting IPs cost what raw IPv4 allocation costs us to operate — minimal overhead beyond the underlying IPv4 lease. Email IPs cost what the full deliverability operational stack costs to operate — warm-up infrastructure, AI Assistant diagnostics, real-time Spamhaus protection, blacklist screening, weekly specialist review, Postmaster Tools/SNDS coordination. Buying the wrong product for your workload either wastes money (paying email-IP pricing for hosting workloads) or destroys deliverability (using hosting IPs for email outbound, which burns the IP within hours of first send and damages domain reputation).

Five offshore VPS mistakes that defeat the purpose

About a third of our new offshore VPS clients arrive after a hosting incident with a previous provider that was made worse by avoidable mistakes. The five patterns below recur across operators with serious workloads:

1. Migrating VPS offshore but keeping CDN, DNS, or auth on US infrastructure

The migration only protects the layer it actually moves. Operators who relocate their VPS to Bulgaria but keep Cloudflare in front (US-incorporated, subject to US legal process), or DNS at GoDaddy (US-hosted), or authentication via Auth0 (US-hosted) still have US-jurisdiction attack surfaces. The fix is full-stack offshore migration where every layer the takedown attacker can target sits in the same offshore jurisdiction. CDN options like BunnyCDN (Slovenia, EU) or self-hosted edge nodes; DNS options like ClouDNS (Bulgaria) or self-hosted; auth via self-hosted infrastructure or EU-based providers. Migration without full-stack consideration creates the false impression of protection while leaving operational dependencies that nullify the offshore architecture.

2. Choosing the wrong jurisdiction for the specific workload type

Different workload types have different jurisdiction-fit profiles. Email infrastructure benefits from Netherlands (best EU connectivity for SMTP routing, established adult/mass-email industry) or Bulgaria (cost-efficient EU for mid-volume senders). Privacy tools (VPN exit nodes, Tor relays) fit Moldova best (non-EU jurisdiction without EU mutual legal assistance exposure). Crypto infrastructure benefits from multi-jurisdiction redundancy. Operators frequently default to Netherlands for everything, missing optimization for their specific workload. We do the workload-to-jurisdiction matching during the discovery call.

3. Confusing no-KYC signup with anonymous-against-criminal-investigation

The most dangerous misunderstanding we encounter. No-KYC signup means we collect minimum data and accept anonymous payment methods — effective protection against threat models A (commercial adversary) and B (state civil adversary). It is NOT protection against threat model C (state criminal investigation with mutual legal assistance treaty deployment). Operators who arrive thinking offshore VPS gives them protection against criminal-grade adversaries are misunderstanding what they bought. We tell them this on the discovery call. Threat model C requires full opsec posture beyond hosting — operational security on the code being deployed, payment trail at the cryptocurrency exchange on-ramp, communication channel security, etc. Hosting is one link in that chain, not the whole chain.

4. Underestimating the offshore latency penalty for performance-sensitive workloads

Offshore hosting comes with latency tradeoffs — a server in Bulgaria has 30-50ms higher latency to US East Coast users than a server in Northern Virginia. For most workloads this is invisible (page loads under 200ms regardless), but for performance-critical workloads (real-time chat, video conferencing, gaming, high-frequency trading) the difference matters. The fix is architectural rather than abandoning offshore: edge CDN serving from BunnyCDN's 119+ PoPs gives users in any region low-latency static content delivery while origin VPS stays in Bulgaria. The right architecture mitigates the latency penalty to near-zero for content delivery while preserving the policy posture for application logic.

5. Using offshore VPS for email outbound without dedicated email IPs

The recurring mistake from operators new to offshore email infrastructure: spinning up an offshore VPS, installing PowerMTA or Postfix, and starting to send email from the VPS's primary IPv4 address. This burns the IP within hours of first send because the IPv4 has no warm-up history, no rDNS-for-sending configured properly, no SPF/DKIM/DMARC alignment, no Postmaster Tools registration. The IP gets blacklisted by Spamhaus within minutes of the first send to a major mailbox provider. The fix is product separation: VPS for application logic, dedicated email IPs (with full deliverability stack) for outbound. The pricing reflects the cost-to-operate difference; using the wrong product for the workload destroys deliverability.

Offshore VPS pricing matrix vs commodity alternatives (2026)

The table below normalizes equivalent VPS specifications across Blue Spirit and the major commodity offshore alternatives. Pricing reflects 2026 market rates for VPS with comparable specs (4 vCPU, 8 GB RAM, 120-160 GB NVMe, 1 Gbps unmetered).

Provider	Jurisdiction	Equivalent VPS price	Abuse handling	No-KYC	Crypto pay
Blue Spirit Offshore VPS M	NL / BG / MD	€29/mo	Human review, due process	Yes (real)	BTC/XMR/USDT/USDC
Contabo VPS M	DE (FRA / FAL)	€8.99/mo	Automated suspension	No (full KYC)	BTC via processor
Hetzner CCX13	DE (FAL / NBG)	€15.49/mo	Automated suspension	No (full KYC)	No
Vultr High Frequency	Global (US-incorporated)	$48/mo	Automated, US DMCA	No	BTC via BitPay
DigitalOcean Premium AMD	Global (US-incorporated)	$48/mo	Automated, US DMCA	No	No
BuyVM (Frantech) Slice	Luxembourg / Las Vegas	$15/mo	Manual review	Partial	BTC/XMR
Njalla VPS	SE (Sweden)	€15/mo	Privacy-focused, manual	Yes (true anonymous)	BTC/XMR/Cash

Three observations from the matrix. First: commodity providers (Contabo, Hetzner) win on raw price for simple workloads — €8.99/mo Contabo is a legitimate good answer if your workload is a personal blog, dev environment, or simple SaaS that will not attract abuse complaints. Second: US-incorporated cloud providers (Vultr, DigitalOcean) charge premium pricing while offering the worst abuse-handling profile for sensitive workloads — $48/mo for automated US DMCA processing is the worst combination on the table. Third: specialist offshore providers (Blue Spirit, Njalla, BuyVM) cluster at €15-29/mo with substantively better operational policy — the cost gap vs commodity is real and reflects the cost of human review, due-process complaint handling, and privacy-respecting operations.

Who uses our offshore VPS

Privacy-conscious operators running their own VPN exit nodes, Tor relays, email self-hosting, password managers, federated services and personal clouds. You want a real server in a sensible jurisdiction that will not be forced into a data grab by a foreign subpoena.

Email infrastructure builders who want a blank VPS to install PowerMTA, Postfix, MailWizz, mautic or their own stack. Our offshore IPs are checked clean and we have the PTR/rDNS process streamlined.

Developers and agencies building software for clients in regulated industries who want hosting that does not suspend on the first abuse report. We are not bulletproof, but we are not trigger-happy either.

Journalists, researchers and NGOs publishing content that is legal where we host but politically inconvenient elsewhere. We have stood up servers for investigative publications and civil-society projects facing coordinated pressure; we know the playbook.

Crypto and DeFi projects running nodes, validators and supporting services that benefit from jurisdictional diversity. Our network peering is optimised for block propagation.

What our VPS is not

It is not a substitute for a dedicated server on high-volume video workloads or extreme I/O patterns. It is not an OpenVZ-in-disguise container product pretending to be a VPS. It is not a managed product — if you want the stack installed and operated, look at our installation service or our managed email products. And it is not a shield for illegal activity: we follow the law of the jurisdiction where the server lives.

How we pick datacenters

We do not buy from the cheapest colocation we can find. Our Netherlands footprint is in EvoSwitch and Serverius, both long-established with proper operational practices. Bulgaria goes through EvoLink and NetInfo. Moldova uses Alexhost infrastructure with direct peering. All of these are Tier-3 or better facilities with redundant power, proper cooling and the kind of on-site staff that can power-cycle your box at 3am when you really need it.

No-KYC · Anonymous signup

Anonymous signup that is actually anonymous.

"No-KYC" has become a marketing tagline that most providers cannot honour. They promise anonymity at signup, then push you into Stripe for payment, which records your card number, billing address, IP geolocation and device fingerprint. By the time your VPS is provisioned, a financial identity trail already exists. We do not do that.

At signup

Email address and optional Telegram/Matrix handle. No government ID, no selfie, no utility bill.

At payment

The payment method you choose determines the data trail. Crypto-only signups stay pseudonymous; PayPal or card transactions are logged by the processor and tied to your legal identity on their side.

Log retention

Access logs are kept for 7 days of operational troubleshooting and then deleted. We do not retain VPN logs, no DNS query logs, no sniffed content.

What each payment method actually reveals

People ask us which crypto is most private, as if it were a single-dimensional question. It is not. Below is the anonymity posture of each method we accept, where 5 means the transaction leaves no usable financial identity trail and 1 means the opposite. This matters because your threat model determines the right choice. A journalist operating from a hostile jurisdiction needs Monero; a SaaS company paying a hosting invoice is fine with card.

Anonymity score by payment method

5 = strongest privacy posture · 1 = weakest

Anonymity rating by payment method
Categoría	Anonymity (1–5)
Monero	5
Bitcoin	5
Ethereum	4
Litecoin	4
USDT (TRC-20)	3
USDC	3
PayPal	2
Credit card	1

Score criteria: Monero (5) is private by protocol; Bitcoin/Ethereum/Litecoin (4–5) are pseudonymous but chain-analysable; stablecoins (3) carry issuer-side Chainalysis screening; PayPal (2) records the payer and enforces its own AUP; credit card (1) ties directly to your legal identity at the card network level.

Method	Symbol	Anonymity	Operator notes
Monero	XMR	★★★★★	Default-private. Stealth addresses + ring signatures.
Bitcoin	BTC	★★★★★	Pseudonymous on-chain; most accepted crypto.
Ethereum	ETH	★★★★★	Pseudonymous on-chain; most liquid L1 after BTC.
Litecoin	LTC	★★★★★	Faster confirmations than BTC; similar privacy model.
USDT (TRC-20)	USDT	★★★★★	Stablecoin; low fees on Tron. KYT screening by issuer.
USDC	USDC	★★★★★	Stablecoin; Ethereum/Polygon. Circle issues, Chainalysis-linked.
PayPal	EUR	★★★★★	Convenient; PayPal records the payer and enforces its own AUP.
Credit card	EUR	★★★★★	Convenient; full identity trail at the card network level.

The threat model question nobody asks you

Most customers who ask for "anonymous hosting" have not clarified anonymous against whom. The question matters because the answer changes which features you actually need. We ask it during onboarding so the setup matches the threat.

Threat model A — commercial adversary. You are worried about a competitor subpoenaing your hosting provider for your identity, or a copyright troll firm filing boilerplate DMCA notices that some providers process without review. For this, the core need is a provider in a DMCA-tolerant jurisdiction with a due-process policy. Payment anonymity is secondary; jurisdiction and operator posture are primary. Card or PayPal are fine.

Threat model B — state-level civil adversary. You are a journalist, NGO or political organiser concerned that a government entity will use civil process (not criminal) to identify you and shut you down. Here jurisdiction and no-logs both matter. Crypto payment (even Bitcoin) is strongly preferred because bank records are the most reliable identity link an adversary can pull. VPN layer on top helps.

Threat model C — state-level criminal adversary. If a government is willing to deploy criminal investigators with mutual legal assistance treaties, you are playing a different game. Jurisdiction becomes everything — the Netherlands cooperates with Five Eyes on criminal matters, for example, while Moldova does not have strong treaty obligations outside its neighbours. Payment anonymity needs to be Monero. And honestly: at this threat level, hosting is one link in a much bigger operational security chain that starts with how you compiled the code you are running.

We operate offshore VPS. We do not operate against criminal investigations. Our service genuinely protects threat models A and B when configured right. Threat model C requires you to bring your own full opsec posture.

Offshore VPS vs. traditional VPS — what actually changes

The technical substrate is identical. KVM is KVM; NVMe is NVMe; BGP is BGP. What changes is what happens when something goes wrong outside the box.

On a traditional cloud VPS (AWS, Azure, DigitalOcean, Vultr), the moment any external party files a complaint — a copyright claim, an abuse report, a government request — an automated system typically suspends the instance within hours. You find out after the fact. The provider is optimising for its own legal exposure, and the cost of suspending you is zero to them.

On our offshore VPS, the first step is that a human in our abuse team reads the complaint. If it is a valid legal process from a court of competent jurisdiction, we cooperate with the process. If it is a boilerplate takedown notice citing foreign law that does not apply here, we decline. If it is a coordinated harassment campaign using false DMCA claims (which we have seen repeatedly), we reject and document. The default state of your server is "running", not "at risk of arbitrary shutdown".

This posture has a cost. We charge more than Vultr per GB of RAM. We are smaller. We are not a household name. Those are real trade-offs. But for operators whose project cannot survive a 48-hour unexplained suspension, the economics are obvious: the price of an offshore VPS is tiny compared to the cost of losing your business to a false flag.

Operational reality: what happens when abuse is filed

We will describe our actual process because most providers will not.

A complaint arrives by email at [email protected]. It gets a ticket. A human reads it — within 24 hours on weekdays, within 48 on weekends. The human assesses four things: who sent it, under what legal framework, what specifically is alleged, and whether the allegation is supportable on its face.

If the complaint cites Dutch, Bulgarian or Moldovan law (depending on the server location) and the allegation appears substantively valid, we contact you with the complaint and a deadline to respond. You get at minimum 7 days, usually 14, unless the complaint carries a court order with an explicit shorter window.

If the complaint cites foreign law that does not apply (typical examples: US DMCA claims against servers in Moldova, German NetzDG takedowns against servers in Bulgaria), we respond to the complainant explaining that the law cited has no force in our jurisdiction, and we do not suspend your service. We copy you on that response.

If the complaint carries a court order from a jurisdiction whose courts we recognise, we comply with the order. We tell you. We give you the full text of the order and any accompanying documents we are legally permitted to share.

We have never suspended a customer without first attempting contact. We have rejected several thousand boilerplate DMCA notices over the years on Moldovan and Bulgarian servers. We have complied with a small number of valid court orders. This is the baseline you should expect from any operator selling offshore product.

Offshore VPS plans

KVM-virtualised servers across three jurisdictions. Same sensible policy on every plan.

Offshore VPS S

From

€ 15 /month

Netherlands datacenter · KVM virtualization
2 vCPU · 4 GB RAM · 60 GB NVMe
Unmetered 1 Gbps bandwidth
1 dedicated IPv4 · IPv6 /64
DDoS protection L3/L4
Crypto payments (BTC, USDT, XMR)

Request a quote

Offshore VPS M

From

€ 29 /month

4 vCPU · 8 GB RAM · 120 GB NVMe
Unmetered 1 Gbps
2 dedicated IPv4 + rDNS
Full root access · any OS
DDoS protection L3/L4/L7
Snapshots & weekly backups

Request a quote

Offshore VPS L

From

€ 59 /month

8 vCPU · 16 GB RAM · 240 GB NVMe
Unmetered 1 Gbps
4 dedicated IPv4 + BGP option
Enterprise DDoS mitigation
Priority support

Request a quote

Offshore VPS — frequently asked questions

What makes a VPS "offshore" versus any other VPS?

Two things: the jurisdiction where the server physically sits and the operator's policy posture. An "offshore" VPS is placed in a jurisdiction with a privacy-respecting legal framework (typically outside the Five Eyes), operated by a provider that applies due process rather than reflexive suspension. Our offshore VPS lives in the Netherlands, Bulgaria and Moldova — all jurisdictions with strong legal protections and courts that examine the merits of requests.

How is your offshore VPS different from Contabo or Hetzner?

Contabo and Hetzner offer excellent commodity VPS products with EU-based servers and generally sensible policies. Where we differ: we specialise in content and workloads that mainstream providers treat as "risk" — email infrastructure, legal adult content, DMCA-ignored content, privacy tools. We do not race to the bottom on price; we charge what it costs to handle those workloads responsibly.

What operating systems are supported?

AlmaLinux 8/9, Rocky 8/9, Ubuntu 20.04/22.04/24.04 LTS, Debian 11/12, FreeBSD 14, and custom ISOs on request. KVM virtualisation so you have real kernel control, not OpenVZ.

Do you provide DDoS protection?

Standard volumetric DDoS protection is included on all plans (up to ~10 Gbps scrubbed). Larger attacks or persistent targeting need a dedicated anti-DDoS plan; we partner with Path Network and Voxility for heavy-duty protection.

How does payment work if I want to be private?

We accept Bitcoin, Monero, Ethereum, Litecoin, USDT and USDC alongside credit cards and PayPal. We only require the information necessary to operate the account (email, username, payment method). If you pay with Monero, there is no financial identity trail on our side at all. If you pay with card or PayPal, the processor applies its own AML rules and records the transaction — on our side, we still keep account data to the operational minimum.

Is "no-KYC" legal?

Yes, for VPS hosting in the jurisdictions where we operate. We are a hosting provider, not a financial institution: we are not required to run KYC against customers under Dutch, Bulgarian or Moldovan law. What we are required to do — and we do — is respond to valid legal process from local authorities when served, and to comply with AML rules on our own banking rails. Crypto payments touch our custodian, not the customer relationship directly.

Do you keep logs?

We keep operational access logs for 7 days, then purge them. We do not keep VPN logs, DNS query logs, sniffed network content or behavioural profiles of any kind. If someone compels us to hand over data in 8 days, there is nothing to hand over.

Which crypto gives me the strongest privacy?

Monero (XMR). Bitcoin and Ethereum are pseudonymous — chain analysis firms can and do trace them back to exchange on-ramps with enough work. Monero is private by design: stealth addresses, ring signatures and confidential transactions mean neither we nor a third party can see the sender, recipient or amount of a Monero payment. USDT and USDC are stablecoins with issuer-side Chainalysis screening, so they are the least private option among crypto.

Pick your jurisdiction. Keep your sanity.

Spin up an offshore VPS Chat on WhatsApp